Realism: Its Relevance and Need for Renewal
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper uses the theoretical lens of realism to analyze the events of World War II generally, and the decision to use the bomb specifically to show how realism still finds salience in international relations theorizing. It shows, however, that while realism has a parsimonious and compelling explanation for how the world works, that there are limits to its explanatory and predictive power. Globalization, international cooperation and interdependence, climate change, refugee crises, pandemics and the flows of people and money across borders are all geopolitical features that realism as a theory has no adequate answer for. The world has changed significantly since 1945 and other schools of thought have emerged that also address the dynamics of the international system in which we live. Liberalism, constructivism and feminism are therefore some of the other perspectives that help us better understand international politics. Realist thinkers should therefore take the opportunity to review some of the theory’s main tenets in order to better respond to its limitations.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The authors keep the copyright and assign to the journal Comentario Internacional the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the attribution license of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in Comentario Internacional.
How to Cite
References
Acharya, Amitav. “Human Security”. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, edited by John Baylis, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens, 448-62. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Allison, Graham. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, US: Little, Brown and Company, 1971.
Alperovitz, Gar. The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb and the Architecture of an American Myth. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995.
Arms Control Association. “Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance”. Arms Control Association. January 2025. https://tinyurl.com/2vycxs58.
Asia for Educators. “The Potsdam Declaration (July 26, 1945)”. Asia for Educators. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/2sf9kde4.
Axelrod, Robert, and Robert Keohane. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions”. World Politics 38 (1985): 226-54.
Barnett, Michael. “Social Constructivism”. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, edited by John Baylis, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens, 148-65. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Barrass, Gordon. The Great Cold War: A Journey Through the Hall of Mirrors. Stanford, US: Stanford University Press, 2009.
Bass, Gary. “Jus Post Bellum”. Philosophy & Public Affairs 32, n.° 4 (2004): 384-412. https://tinyurl.com/3ecpuc66.
BBC. “Fact File: Hiroshima and Nagasaki”. BBC. October 15th, 2014. https://tinyurl.com/5yej2n2r.
Blinken, Anthony. “The United States Officially Rejoins the Paris Agreement: Press Statement”. US Department of State. February 19th, 2021. https://tinyurl.com/4czr8rnn.
Booth, Ken. “Security and Emancipation”. Review of International Studies 17, n.° 4 (1991): 313-26. https://tinyurl.com/ywwcf9ze.
Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan, 1995.
Burchill, Scott, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly, Matthew Paterson, Christian Reus-Smit and Jacqui True. Theories of International Relations. New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2005.
History. “Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki”. History. July 31st, 2024. https://tinyurl.com/35cea49v.
History Learning Site. “Famous Battles of World War Two”. History Learning Site. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/559hcj76.
Hollis, Martin, and Steve Smith. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1991.
Hughes, Thomas, and John Graham Royde-Smith. “World War II”. Encyclopedia Britannica. May 12th, 2024. https://tinyurl.com/2ss6s7xf.
ICAN. “Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings”. ICAN. Accessed May 13th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/ej4kv5rn.
Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen. Introduction to International Relations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press, 1976. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77bx3.
Keohane, Robert, and Joseph Nye, Jr. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. New York: Longman, 2001.
Little, Richard, and John Williams, eds. Anarchical Society in a Globalized World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
Lukas, John. 1945: Year Zero. New York: Doubleday and Company, 1978.
Mearsheimer, John. “Reckless States and Realism”. International Relations 23 (2009): 241-56.
—. “The False Promise of International Institutions”. International Security 19, n.° 3 (1994-1995): 5-49. https://tinyurl.com/256s5yr5.
Morton, Louis. The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb. Washington DC: Center of Military History, 1990.
Moseley, Alexander. “Just War Theory”. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed May 13th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/5n8sjx4u.
Norwich University. “Who Were the Manhattan Project Scientists?”. Norwich University. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/4m9eundp.
Oklahoma Historical Society. “Important Leaders in World War II”. Oklahoma Historical Society. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/2kbpuabp.
Pape, Robert. “Soft Balancing against the United States”. International Security 30, n.° 1 (2005): 7-45. https://tinyurl.com/4r43xma5.
Powell, Robert. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory”. American Political Science Review 85, n.° 4 (1991): 1303-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963947.
Pradeep, Gautam. “The Nuclear Bomb and How It Changed the World”. StudyLib. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/yc5ttxy4.
Richie, Alexandra. “The Invasion of Poland”. The National WWII Museum. October 17th, 2017. https://tinyurl.com/4vpn73de.
Rosenberg, Jennifer. “A Short Guide to the Vietnam War: What Everyone Should Know About the Vietnam Conflict”. ThoughtCo. September 6th, 2021. https://tinyurl.com/j9cp6d5e.
Ruiz, Tricia. “Feminist Theory and International Relations: The Feminist Challenge to Realism and Liberalism”. Soundings Journal 2 (2005).
Schmidt, Brian, and Colin Wight. “Rationalism and the ‘Rational Actor Assumption’ in Realist International Relations Theory”. Journal of International Political Theory 19, n.° 2 (2023): 158-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882221144643.
Sherwin, Martin. “The Atomic Bomb and the Origins of the Cold War: U.S. Atomic-Energy Policy and Diplomacy, 1941-45”. The American Historical Review 78, n.° 4 (1973): 945-68.
Singh, Kanishka. “Trump Again Conditions US Help to NATO Allies on their Paying ‘Fair Share’”. Reuters. March 19th, 2024. https://tinyurl.com/bdv9jfkv.
SIPRI. SIPRI Year Book 2013: Armaments, Disarmaments and International Security. Summary. Solna, SE: SIPRI, 2013. https://tinyurl.com/ya376c3v.
Steans, Jill, and Lloyd Pettiford. International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. London: Pearson, 2001.
Strange, Susan. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge, US: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Takahara, Akio. “A Japanese Perspective on China’s Rise and the East Asian Order”. In China’s Ascent: Power, Security and the Future of International Politics, edited by Robert Ross and Zhu Feng, 218-37. New York: Cornell University Press, 2008.
Taylor, Paul, and Devon Curtis. “The United Nations”. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, edited by John Baylis, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens, 310-26. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017.
The National WWII Museum. “The Big Three”. The National WWII Museum. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/y4x4t9ej.
Thorburn, Diana. “Feminism Meets International Relations”. SAIS Review (1989-2003) 20, n.° 2 (2000): 1-10. https://tinyurl.com/mtvrc65r.
Thucydides. “The Peloponnesian War, The Melian Dialogue (Book 5, Chapter 17)”. Wellesley College. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/yjjwxnu6.
Tickner, Arlene. “Seeing International Relations Differently: Notes From The Third World”. Millennium 32, n.° 2 (2003): 295-324.
Trueman, C. N. “League of Nations”. History Learning Site. May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/3xrx2azc.
Ultimate Bible Reference Library. “Wars Fought Since 1945 to 2010”. Ultimate Bible Reference Library. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/4szpwv5m.
UN. “Former Secretaries-General”. United Nations. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/4kakt477.
UN Office for Disarmament Affairs. Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). July 1st, 1968. https://tinyurl.com/3h4mkw3u.
UN Security Council. “Permanent and Non-Permanent Members”. United Nations Security Council. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/yvmyu2bn.
US Air Force. “The Story of the Atomic Bomb”. US Air Force. Accessed March 11th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/mu7z6whs.
US National Park Service. “Women in World War II”. National Park Service. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/3tn6vj6z.
US Office of the Historian. “Atomic Diplomacy”. Office of the Historian. Accessed May 14th, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/mscyxm38.
Vogler, John. “Environmental Issues”. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, edited by John Baylis, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens, 385-401. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Waltz, Kenneth. “Structural Realism after the Cold War”. International Security 25, n.° 1 (2000): 5-41. https://tinyurl.com/yhyp5e3j.
Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics”. International Organization 46, n.° 2 (1992): 391-425.
Wight, Martin, Gabriele Wright and Brian Porter. International Theory: The Three Traditions. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 1991.
Yetiv, Steve. Explaining Foreign Policy: US Decision-Making and the Persian Gulf War. Baltimore, US: Johns Hopkins Press, 2004.