Epistemologías de la inclusión entre continentes y culturas: Realismo radical y narración de historias

Contenido principal del artículo

Anne Carr
Gabriela Bonilla

Resumen

Lo que importa en toda historia es cómo se la cuenta y cómo se la escucha. Rutherford describe la narración como una guía para la acción, que puede permitir una división del trabajo entre el o los narradores y el o los lectores u oyentes. Simplemente por cómo es contada la historia, se pueden inferir formas de acción normativamente justificadas. Aunque este relato de la narración parece más prescriptivo que realista, nadie está obligado a leerlo o escucharlo para entenderlo, independientemente de lo exigente que sea. Las historias, siempre que seamos epistémicamente justos en nuestra lectura y escucha, pueden superar la dicotomía entre comprensiones prescriptivas e interpretativas. La apertura de esta posibilidad puede proporcionar a los realistas contemporáneos preceptos normativos no moralistas y ajenos al statu quo. Partiendo del reconocimiento de que el modo en que conocemos la realidad y articulamos ese conocimiento determina nuestros procesos de investigación, podemos reconfigurar e inventar nuevos juicios sobre los límites de la educación (política). A través de evidencia basada en un trabajo colaborativo y de historias de migración, grupos interdisciplinarios de estudiantes universitarios del Sur y el Norte global navegaron virtualmente
por las múltiples perspectivas de volatilidad, imprevisibilidad y complejidad de nuestro mundo interrelacionado. Al ampliar su capacidad colectiva para crear un espacio para conversaciones difíciles sobre las historias que escucharon, abrieron la posibilidad de proporcionar preceptos normativos que no son moralistas ni parte del statu quo.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.noStats##

Detalles del artículo

Sección

Tema central

Cómo citar

Epistemologías de la inclusión entre continentes y culturas: Realismo radical y narración de historias. (2025). Comentario Internacional: Revista Del Centro Andino De Estudios Internacionales, 23, 127-147. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312549.2023.23.6

Referencias

Allen, Chris. “Controversy: Is Prevent Harming Universities?”. Political Insight 8, n.° 1 (2017): 38-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041905817702738.

Aytac, Ugur, and Enzo Rossi. “Ideology Critique without Morality: A Radical Realist Approach”. American Political Science Review 117, n.° 4 (2023): 1215-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001216.

Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Space. Boston, US: Beacon Press, 1994.

Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.

Borger, Merel, Anita van Hoof, Irene Costera and José Sanders. “Constructing Participatory Journalism as a Scholarly Object: A Genealogical Analysis”. Digital Journalism 1, n.° 1 (2012): 117-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.740267.

Carpentier, Nico. Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Bristol, UK: Intellect Ltd., 2011.

Carr, Anne, Gabriela Bonilla, Athena Alchazidu, William Booth, Katerina Chudová, Patricia Tineo and Pilar Constanzo. “Epistemic (In)Justice: Whose Voices Count? Listening to Migrants and Students”. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education 15, n.° 5 (2023): 111-27. https://tinyurl.com/bdd5k8n8.

—, Mónica Martínez and Patricia Ortega. “Expectations of Ecuadorian Higher Education in a Time of Uncertainty: A Comparison Between the Perceptions of Students and Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020/21)”. In Building the Post-Pandemic University: Imagining, Contesting and Materializing Higher Education Futures, edited by Mark Carrigan, Hannah Moscovitz, Michele Martini and Susan Robertson, 136-68. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204575.00017.

—, Patricia Ortega and Mónica Martínez. “Online Teaching: Taking Advantage of Complexity to See What We Did Not Notice Before”. In Handbook of Research on the Global Empowerment of Educators and Student Learning Through Action Research, edited by Alina Slapac, Phyllis Balcerzak and Kathryn O’Brien, 144-69. Hershey, US: IGI Global, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6922-1.ch007.

Chernilo, Daniel. A Social Theory of the Nation-State: The Political Forms of Modernity Beyond Methodological Nationalism. London: Routledge, 2007.

Chun Guo, Grace, Akram al Ariss and Chris Brewster. “Understanding the Global Refugee Crisis: Managerial Consequences and Policy Implications”. Academy of Management Perspectives 34, n.° 4 (2019): 531-45. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0013.

De Wit, Hans, Jocelyne Gacel-Avila, Elspeth Jones and Nico Jooste, eds. The Globalization of Internationalization: Emerging Voices and Perspectives. London: Routledge, 2017.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, US: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.

European Parliament. Internationalisation of Higher Education. Brussels: European Parliament, 2015.

Finlayson, Lorna. The Political Is Political: Conformity and the Illusion of Dissent in Contemporary Political Philosophy. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2015.

Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, 1972.

Fricker, Miranda. “Evolving Concepts of Epistemic Injustice”. In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, edited by Ian Kidd, José Medina and Gaile Pohlhaus Jr., 53-60. New York: Routledge, 2017.

Geuss, Raymond. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press, 2008.

Gutiérrez, Kris, Patricia Baquedano and Carlos Tejeda. “Rethinking Diversity: Hybridity and Hybrid Language Practices in the Third Space”. Mind, Culture, and Activity 6, n.° 4 (1999): 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733.

Hathaway, James. “A Reconsideration of the Underlying Premise of Refugee Law”. In International Refugee Law, edited by Héléne Lambert, 129-83. London: Routledge, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092478.

Ifewunigwe, Jayne. Forum for Scholars and Publics. Durham, US: Duke University Press, 2021.

Ireland. European Union (Marrakesh Treaty) Regulations 2018 (S. I. No. 412/2018). October 9th, 2018. https://tinyurl.com/55p528z7.

Koirala-Azad, Shabnam, and Emma Fuentes. “Introduction: Activist Scholarship. Possibilities and Constraints of Participatory Action Research”. Social Justice 36, n.° 4 (2009): 1-5. https://tinyurl.com/5zvtafmr.

Livingstone, Sonia. “The Participation Paradigm in Audience Research”. The Communication Review 16, n.° 1-2 (2013): 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2013.757174.

Martin, Karen, and Booran Mirraboopa. “Ways of Knowing, Being and Doing: A Theoretical Framework and Methods for Indigenous and Indigenist Research”. Journal of Australian Studies 27, n.° 76 (2003): 203-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443050309387838.

Matikainen, Janne. “Motivations for Content Generation in Social Media”. Participations. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies 12, n.° 1 (2015): 41-58. https://tinyurl.com/mrxtxb5t.

Molyneux, Rebecca. “College Staff Attitudes Towards the Use of Online Mental Health Interventions in Further Education”. Manchester Metropolitan University, 2018. https://tinyurl.com/2eph926m.

Pereira, Egberto, and José Carlos Rothen. “Gramsci, as Revistas, o Intelectual e a Educação”. Educação em Revista 34 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698178809.

Prinz, Janosch, and Enzo Rossi. “Political Realism as Ideology Critique”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20, n.° 3 (2017): 348-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1293908.

Quandt, Thorsten. “Dark Participation”. Media and Communication 6, n.° 4 (2018): 36-48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519.

Rossi, Enzo. “Being Realistic and Demanding the Impossible”. Constellations. An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 26, n.° 4 (2019): 638-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12446.

Ruiz, Carlos, David Domingo, Josep Lluís Micó, Javier Díaz, Koldo Meso and Pere Masip. “Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers”. The International Journal of Press/Politics 16, n.° 4 (2011): 463-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211415849.

Rutherford, Nat. “Is Political Realism Barren? Normativity and Story-Telling”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25, n.° 6 (2022): 824-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2120658.

Selwyn, Neil, Selena Nemorin, Scott Bulfin and Nicola Johnson. “Toward a Digital Sociology of School”. In Digital Sociologies, edited by Jessie Daniels, Karen Gregory and Tressie McMillan Cottom, 147-62. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 2017.

Silva, Gustavo, Wallas Siqueira, Geraldo Lopes, Yuri Bento, Nilton Cesar and Rómulo Silveira. “Brazilian Students’ Expectations Regarding Distance Learning and Remote Classes During the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 20, n.° 4 (2020): 65-80. https://tinyurl.com/4hc8bedf.

Sleat, Matt. “Realism and Political Normativity”. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (2022): 465-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10239-8.

Suad Nasir, Nailah, Carol Lee, Roy Pea and Maxine McKinney de Royston. “Rethinking Learning: What the Interdisciplinary Science Tells Us”. Educational Researcher 50, n.° 8 (2021): 557-65. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211047251.

Williams, Bernard. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press, 2005.

Wimmer, Franz. “Intercultural Polylogues in Philosophy”. The International Review of Information Ethics 7 (2007): 82-9. https://doi.org/10.29173/irie9.