El Estado como actor en las relaciones internacionales: Una visión desde el realismo
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El objetivo del presente artículo es analizar al Estado como actor en la teoría del realismo de las relaciones internacionales. En un primer momento se examina el concepto de Estado desde una perspectiva histórica, para lograr entender su dinamismo. Luego se observa el papel del Estado como actor internacional dentro de la teoría realista, contrastando los planteamientos teóricos con ejemplos de conflictos y situaciones actuales en el campo de las relaciones internacionales. Finalmente se sugiere que, a pesar de que el realismo clásico tuvo su apogeo luego de la Segunda Guerra Mundial y hasta los años 70, varias décadas después, sucesos como la caída de las Torres Gemelas, la influencia de China en el mundo y la guerra entre Rusia y Ucrania nos llevan a entender que la lucha por el poder y la influencia siguen haciendo de los Estados los actores fundamentales del sistema internacional.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Detalles del artículo
Sección
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los autores que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
1. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista Comentario Internacional el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en Comentario Internacional.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Allen, Chris. “Controversy: Is Prevent Harming Universities?”. Political Insight 8, n.° 1 (2017): 38-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041905817702738.
Aytac, Ugur, and Enzo Rossi. “Ideology Critique without Morality: A Radical Realist Approach”. American Political Science Review 117, n.° 4 (2023): 1215-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001216.
Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Space. Boston, US: Beacon Press, 1994.
Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.
Borger, Merel, Anita van Hoof, Irene Costera and José Sanders. “Constructing Participatory Journalism as a Scholarly Object: A Genealogical Analysis”. Digital Journalism 1, n.° 1 (2012): 117-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.740267.
Carpentier, Nico. Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Bristol, UK: Intellect Ltd., 2011.
Carr, Anne, Gabriela Bonilla, Athena Alchazidu, William Booth, Katerina Chudova, Patricia Tineo y Pilar Constanzo. “(In)justicia epistémica: ¿Qué voces importan? Escuchar a migrantes y estudiantes”. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education 15, n.° 5 (2023): 111–127. https://tinyurl.com/bdd5k8n8.
—, Mónica Martínez and Patricia Ortega. “Expectations of Ecuadorian Higher Education in a Time of Uncertainty: A Comparison Between the Perceptions of Students and Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020/21)”. In Building the Post-Pandemic University: Imagining, Contesting and Materializing Higher Education Futures, edited by Mark Carrigan, Hannah Moscovitz, Michele Martini and Susan Robertson, 136-68. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204575.00017.
—, Patricia Ortega and Mónica Martínez. “Online Teaching: Taking Advantage of Complexity to See What We Did Not Notice Before”. In Handbook of Research on the Global Empowerment of Educators and Student Learning Through Action Research, edited by Alina Slapac, Phyllis Balcerzak and Kathryn O’Brien, 144-69. Hershey, US: IGI Global, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6922-1.ch007.
Chernilo, Daniel. A Social Theory of the Nation-State: The Political Forms of Modernity Beyond Methodological Nationalism. London: Routledge, 2007.
Chun Guo, Grace, Akram al Ariss and Chris Brewster. “Understanding the Global Refugee Crisis: Managerial Consequences and Policy Implications”. Academy of Management Perspectives 34, n.° 4 (2019): 531-45. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0013.
De Wit, Hans, Jocelyne Gacel-Avila, Elspeth Jones and Nico Jooste, eds. The Globalization of Internationalization: Emerging Voices and Perspectives. London: Routledge, 2017.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, US: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
European Parliament. Internationalisation of Higher Education. Brussels: European Parliament, 2015.
Finlayson, Lorna. The Political Is Political: Conformity and the Illusion of Dissent in Contemporary Political Philosophy. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2015.
Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, 1972.
Fricker, Miranda. “Evolving Concepts of Epistemic Injustice”. In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic
Injustice, edited by Ian Kidd, José Medina and Gaile Pohlhaus Jr., 53-60. New York: Routledge, 2017.
Geuss, Raymond. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press, 2008.
Gutiérrez, Kris, Patricia Baquedano and Carlos Tejeda. “Rethinking Diversity: Hybridity and Hybrid Language Practices in the Third Space”. Mind, Culture, and Activity 6, n.° 4 (1999): 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733.
Hathaway, James. “A Reconsideration of the Underlying Premise of Refugee Law”. In International Refugee Law, edited by Héléne Lambert, 129-83. London: Routledge, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092478.
Ifewunigwe, Jayne. Forum for Scholars and Publics. Durham, US: Duke University Press, 2021.
Ireland. European Union (Marrakesh Treaty) Regulations 2018 (S. I. No. 412/2018). October 9th 2018. https://tinyurl.com/55p528z7.
Koirala-Azad, Shabnam, and Emma Fuentes. “Introduction: Activist Scholarship. Possibilities and Constraints of Participatory Action Research”. Social Justice 36, n.° 4 (2009): 1-5. https://tinyurl.com/5zvtafmr.
Livingstone, Sonia. “The Participation Paradigm in Audience Research”. The Communication Review 16, n.° 1-2 (2013): 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2013.757174.
Martin, Karen, and Booran Mirraboopa. “Ways of Knowing, Being and Doing: A Theoretical Framework and Methods for Indigenous and Indigenist Research”. Journal of Australian Studies 27, n.° 76 (2003): 203-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443050309387838.
Matikainen, Janne. “Motivations for Content Generation in Social Media”. Participations. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies 12, n.° 1 (2015): 41-58. https://tinyurl.com/mrxtxb5t.
Molyneux, Rebecca. “College Staff Attitudes Towards the Use of Online Mental Health Interventions in Further Education”. Manchester Metropolitan University. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/2eph926m.
Pereira, Egberto, and José Carlos Rothen. “Gramsci, as Revistas, o Intelectual e a Educação”. Educação em Revista 34 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698178809.
Prinz, Janosch, and Enzo Rossi. “Political Realism as Ideology Critique”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20, n.° 3 (2017): 348-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1293908.
Quandt, Thorsten. “Dark Participation”. Media and Communication 6, n.° 4 (2018): 36-48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519.
Rossi, Enzo. “Being Realistic and Demanding the Impossible”. Constellations. An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 26, n.° 4 (2019): 638-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12446.
Ruiz, Carlos, David Domingo, Josep Lluís Micó, Javier Díaz, Koldo Meso and Pere Masip. “Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers”. The International Journal of Press/Politics 16, n.° 4 (2011): 463-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211415849.
Rutherford, Nat. “Is Political Realism Barren? Normativity and Story-Telling”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25, n.° 6 (2022): 824-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2120658.
Selwyn, Neil, Selena Nemorin, Scott Bulfin and Nicola Johnson. “Toward a Digital Sociology of School”. In Digital Sociologies, edited by Jessie Daniels, Karen Gregory and Tressie McMillan Cottom, 147-62. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 2017.
Silva, Gustavo, Wallas Siqueira, Geraldo Lopes, Yuri Bento, Nilton Cesar and Rômulo Silveira. “Brazilian Students’ Expectations Regarding Distance Learning and Remote Classes During the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 20, n.° 4 (2020): 65-80. https://tinyurl.com/4hc8bedf.
Sleat, Matt. “Realism and Political Normativity”. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (2022): 465-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10239-8.
Suad Nasir, Na’ilah, Carol Lee, Roy Pea and Maxine McKinney de Royston. “Rethinking Learning: What the Interdisciplinary Science Tells Us”. Educational Researcher 50, n.° 8 (2021): 557-65. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211047251.
Williams, Bernard. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Wimmer, Franz. “Intercultural Polylogues in Philosophy”. The International Review of Information Ethics 7 (2007): 82-9. https://doi.org/10.29173/irie9.